Review · Tasting
Eight Movements: A Night Through the Tasting Menu
From the first amuse-bouche to the final mignardise — a guest's slow walk through a chef's quiet manifesto.
A tasting menu is a film with eight scenes. You sit down without knowing the script, and the chef directs your evening from a kitchen you cannot see. The first course always arrives too quickly, before you have settled into your chair, and the last one arrives too slowly, when you have already begun to mourn the meal that is ending.
The opening was a single oyster, dressed only in a clear consommé that tasted of the sea in a different language than the oyster did. It was the kind of dish that makes you put down your phone, because there is nothing to photograph and nothing to say. You eat it, and then you wait for what comes next.
The middle of the meal
The third course was a pithivier of game bird, golden and lacquered, cut at the table. Steam rose from the cross-section like a small accident of geometry. Beside it, a sauce the colour of old bronze, reduced for what must have been hours. You think, briefly, of the labour. Then you stop thinking, because the food is asking you to be present, not analytical.
Two courses of fish followed — one raw, dressed only with green olive oil and a single leaf of shiso; the other cooked at low heat until it gave up its structure. Between them, a sorbet of yuzu and elderflower that did the work of an entire chapter break.
I have eaten in many three-star rooms in France. This evening was the first time, in a long time, that the kitchen surprised me with restraint rather than ornament.
What a tasting menu is for
A tasting menu, done well, is not about abundance. It is about giving the diner a chance to read a chef the way one reads a novelist — across many pages, at the chef's chosen pace, in the chef's chosen order. By the time you reach the cheese course, you know whether this is a kitchen that loves butter or a kitchen that fears it. You know whether the pastry chef thinks of dessert as a finale or a footnote.
Here, dessert was treated as a finale. A small tower of poached pear, vanilla cream, and a sheet of caramel so thin it broke audibly under the spoon. The room paused for a second, the way concert halls pause between movements. Then the mignardises arrived on a dark wooden tray, and the meal admitted, gracefully, that it was over.
The pacing was considered. Three hours that felt like ninety minutes. I left without the heaviness one usually carries home from such evenings.
One small note on price
We do not publish the cost of menus on this site. Prices change, and a written number always feels heavier than a spoken one. What can be said is this: the value of a long tasting menu is not in the food alone. It is in the time given to you, the seat you occupy for an evening, the labour you do not see, and the silence between courses that the kitchen has earned the right to ask of you.
If that sounds like a cost worth paying, you already understand why this kind of dining endures. If it does not, no review will ever convince you, and that is also fine. Not every story has to be your story.
Continue reading
← Back to the Journal